Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay Example for Free

spacebelts Laws be Beneficial- Dis pair EssayThe article that is being critique is called Primary Seat belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. The write of this article is Kathyrn OLeary Higgins. She explains on the reasoning behind why seatbelt laws be very beneficial to gestate. Her main reasoning of this article is to explain and commend you for considering this measure that will so easily save many another(prenominal) motor vehicle occupants from crash-related deaths and injuries. She strongly believes that stack who do not wear in that location seatbelt atomic number 18 more likely to get in to car accidents. She did a great concern putting this article together with all the good information and great points to each idea. The author Kathyrn does violate good credibility throughout her article. Her vocabulary was good aimed toward college students. She did not however look in the committal on how seatbelt laws put up be unbeneficial. Although her topic is very deb atable many do not agree with the idea that seatbelt enforcement laws atomic number 18 beneficial. Seatbelt laws may be the number one defense against motor vehicle injuries and fatalities.The author overly mentions that, These revoltrs, who take on not to buckle up, tend to exhibit multiple high risk behaviors and are more frequently involved in crashes. Yet, that idea can be very debatable. Many tidy sum would highly disagree, just because you arent corroding your seatbelt doesnt many you are more likely to drive crazy. In addition, Many people believe that it should be your own decision if you want to wear a seatbelt or not. Yes there may be many cases where a seatbelt has saved individuals lives. But there are also many accidents where a seatbelt has killed a persons life or seriously hurt the individual. For an example on how a seatbelt killed an individual, there was one accident wear the car caught on disregard and the individual could not get the seatbelt unattached which kept him trapped in the car and died from the fire. Also many people get injured from seatbelts. They get bad chest and shoulder injuries.There was one constitution that mentioned on how the mother left her daughter in the car while she was having a conversation with a friend. She had a bad feeling and deceided to stop and check on her daughter. She knew something was not right when seen that her daughter wasnt moving around. She opened the door to see her daughter with two seatbelts wrapped around her neck. She was strangling there and as they tried to un wrap the seatbelts they got tighter, until they finally got something to cut the seatbelts and get her loose. Thats another great example on how seatbelts arent always there for just refugety. Some people even believe that they can drive faster if wearing their seatbelt, they believe if they crash they are safe due to the seatbelt, which is ridiculous. If this just sounds short absurd, ask yourself would you drive with gr eater care if one fine day- you woke and discovered that someone cut out your seatbelt?If the answer is yes, then it means you arent driving as safely as you can, right instantaneously with your seatbelt on (Kumar, Navin. 1). Yes in many cases seatbelts reduce the amount of accidents that happen, and they decrease the number of deaths. But they cause people to drive faster and more recklessly, causing more accidents and increasing the number of people who die. Seatbelt laws are also hypocritical. The author mentions, Although opponents to primary enforcement seat belt laws claim that nonuse is a personal choice and affects only the individual, the detail is that motor vehicle injuries and fatalities have a significant societal cost.Why is it that a person in a vehicle has to wear a seatbelt yet a motorcyclist doesnt have to wear a helmet? The beneficial law is a violation of a persons freedom. Seatbelts are there if a person chooses to wear one, and those who want to can wear th eir seatbelt, but those who dont want to shouldnt be forced to wear one. If some people think others are risking their life because they arent wearing their seatbelt then thats their opinion. Our belief is that its up to you to make your own decisions. The government shouldnt be forcing anyone to do anything for their own good. In a free society, if someone is injured or killed because they freely choose to use or not use their seatbelt, that is a persons tragedy, as it is with other freely chosen risks in life. Its not at all reasonable.CitationsHiggins, Kathyrn OLeary. Primary Seat Belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. Cars in America. Ed. Andrea C. Nakaya. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from Testimony of Honorable Kathryn OLeary Higgins, Board Member, National Transportation Safety Board. 2009. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 4 Feb. 2013.http//ic.galegroup.com.gary.libproxy.ivytech.edu.allstate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPag e/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=query=prodId=OVICwindowstate=normalcontentModules=mode=viewdisplayGroupName=Viewpointslimiter=currPage=disableHighlighting=truedisplayGroups=sortBy=source=search_within_results=action=ecatId=activityType=scanId=documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010429245Kumar, Navin. Can safety regulations kill you? How safe are seatbelts and seatbelt laws? Digital Bits Skeptic. Copyright. 2012. Web 4 Feb 2013. http//www.dbskeptic.com/2009/06/21/can-safety-regulations-kill-you-how-safe-are-seabelts-and-seatbelt-laws/http//www.sallycphotography.com/archives/2005