Connection Between School Culture and Leadership Styles :: Leadership

There is a connection surrounded by instruct culture and leadership styles. The lit review will also reference point the both basic categories of leadership. According to Cox (2001), there are two basic categories of leadership which are transactional and transformational. The following scholars (Barnett, McCormick & Conners, 2001) made the distinction between transactional and transformational leadership. James McGregor Burns (1998) says Burns the difference between ordinary (transactional) and ludicrous (transformational) leaders. According to James McGregor Burns (1998) transactional leaders exchanged tangible rewards for the mould and loyalty of followers, and (transformational) leaders are the ones who engaged with followers. Additionally, the focused on high order intrinsic needs, and raised consciousness about the significance of particularised outcomes. (Bernard Bass, 2003) introduces the conception of transactional and transformational leadership. He sta tes that they are separate concepts and that good leaders distinguish characteristics of both. Bass (1990b, p. 21) states that Transformational leadership fosters capacity development and brings higher levels of personal fealty amongst followers. However, transformational leadership occurs when leaders broaden and elevate the interests of their employees. (Kelly, 2003 Yukl, 1989) asserts that Transformational leaders elevate mass from low levels of need. Transformational leaders are said to create trust, admiration, loyalty and evaluate amongst their followers (Barbuto, 2005, p. 28). (Rice, 1993) determines that Transformational leadership is also based on self-reflective changing of determine and beliefs by the leader and their followers. From this emerges a key characteristic of transformational leadership. According to Gronn (1996) the literature in educational leadership offers no single conception of the processes that constitute transformational leaders hip. Gronn (1996) makes emphasis on the close relationship between charismatic and transformational leadership. He point out the absence of notions of charisma in some blend in transformational leadership. (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2000) introduce the four main factors that make up transformational leadership whereas. They introduce the four main factors which are 1.) Idealized influence, 2.) Inspirational motivation, 3.) Intellectual stimulation, 4.) personalized consideration. The Additive Effect of Transformational Leadership supports these four main factors Hall, Johnson, Wysocki and Kepner (2002, p. 2). It will precise important to evaluate the four main factors and the effect they can dupe when dealing with the topic of discussion which is the role of the principal in geological formation school culture.